Transgression: Difference between revisions

From Sean's Gospel Topical Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (1 revision)
(Updated formatting and added cross-reference.)
Line 1: Line 1:
*Dallin H. Oaks, "The Great Plan of Happiness", October Conference, 1993, Sunday Afternoon Session
*Dallin H. Oaks, "The Great Plan of Happiness", October Conference, 1993, Sunday Afternoon Session
Elder oaks discusses the fall and contrasts sin with transgression. Some interesting quotes extent. (ie. I should go out and get those sources.)
:Elder oaks discusses the fall and contrasts sin with transgression. Some interesting quotes extent. (ie. I should go out and get those sources.)
*[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/132/59-60#59 ]
 
Gives a description of conditions that could not be sin, but could be transgression. Suggests that transgressions create a need to sacrifice.
*[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/132/59-60#59 D&C 132:59-60]
:Gives a description of conditions that could not be sin, but could be transgression. Suggests that transgressions create a need to sacrifice.
 
*[http://www.fairlds.org/Mormonism_201/m20105.html#enloc22 Kevin W. Graham, "The Fall: Is All Transgression a Sin?", FAIR]
*[http://www.fairlds.org/Mormonism_201/m20105.html#enloc22 Kevin W. Graham, "The Fall: Is All Transgression a Sin?", FAIR]
An interesting discussion of transgressions which might provide some food for thought and certainly is valuable in demonstarting that the sin/transgression distinction is not unique to Mormonism. However, the the thinking relies on Biblical word-usage in a way that at times makes me cringe, because it seems to ignore the possibility of corruption of the text. However as a work of apologetics this is fitting, since it speaks to the prejudice of the intendid audience.
:An interesting discussion of transgressions which might provide some food for thought and certainly is valuable in demonstrating that the sin/transgression distinction is not unique to Mormonism. However, the the thinking relies on Biblical word-usage in a way that at times makes me cringe, because it seems to ignore the possibility of corruption of the text. However as a work of apologetics this is fitting, since it speaks to the prejudice of the intended audience.


==Cross-References==
==Cross-References==
*[[Punishment]]
*[[Sin]]
*[[Sin]]

Revision as of 21:00, 18 May 2017

  • Dallin H. Oaks, "The Great Plan of Happiness", October Conference, 1993, Sunday Afternoon Session
Elder oaks discusses the fall and contrasts sin with transgression. Some interesting quotes extent. (ie. I should go out and get those sources.)
Gives a description of conditions that could not be sin, but could be transgression. Suggests that transgressions create a need to sacrifice.
An interesting discussion of transgressions which might provide some food for thought and certainly is valuable in demonstrating that the sin/transgression distinction is not unique to Mormonism. However, the the thinking relies on Biblical word-usage in a way that at times makes me cringe, because it seems to ignore the possibility of corruption of the text. However as a work of apologetics this is fitting, since it speaks to the prejudice of the intended audience.

Cross-References