Abortion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added citation.) |
(Added citation.) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:Report of the debunking of | :Report of the debunking of | ||
:See also: | :See also: | ||
:*“The Impact of Legalised Abortion on Crime”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 2001. | |||
:*“Testing Economic Hypotheses with State-Level Data: A comment on Donohue and Levitt (2001)”. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston working paper. November 2005. Available at www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2005/wp0515.pdf | |||
==Cross-References== | ==Cross-References== | ||
Revision as of 15:55, 18 April 2016
- Dallin H. Oaks, "Weightier Matters", Ensign, Jan. 2001, p. 13
- "It is a crime next to murder itself to destroy and abort the fetus except for extreme reasons which would endanger the life of the mother."
- "Thou shalt not ... kill, nor do anything like unto it."
- Tadd R. Callister, "The Inevitable Apostasy", pp. 207-212
- Early Christian opposition to abortion.
- Footnote 341 of chapter 14 has a good noteworthy line of reasoning condemning abortion on biblical grounds.
- "Oops-onomics", The Economist, 1 Dec 2005
- Report of the debunking of
- See also:
- “The Impact of Legalised Abortion on Crime”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 2001.
- “Testing Economic Hypotheses with State-Level Data: A comment on Donohue and Levitt (2001)”. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston working paper. November 2005. Available at www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2005/wp0515.pdf