The Anthon Transcript: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added citation.) |
(Added citation.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Joseph Smith Jr. in Dean C. Jesse, ed., "The Papers of Joseph Smith", Vol. 1. p. 9 | *Joseph Smith Jr. in Dean C. Jesse, ed., "The Papers of Joseph Smith", Vol. 1. p. 9 | ||
* Maxwell Institute, [https://youtu.be/bW65LrdubZ0?t=1458 "Royal Skousen, "The Original and Printer's Manuscripts" (Book of Mormon lecture, 1 of 3)"], YouTube | |||
:At about 24:18 Royal Skousen talks a bit about the document popularly referred to as the Anthon Transcript. | |||
* Maxwell Institute, [https://youtu.be/KRgAt4PHo_8?t=7809 "Royal Skousen, "The Nature of the Original Text" (Book of Mormon lecture, 3 of 3)"], YouTube | * Maxwell Institute, [https://youtu.be/KRgAt4PHo_8?t=7809 "Royal Skousen, "The Nature of the Original Text" (Book of Mormon lecture, 3 of 3)"], YouTube | ||
Revision as of 22:55, 12 September 2019
- Joseph Smith Jr. in Dean C. Jesse, ed., "The Papers of Joseph Smith", Vol. 1. p. 9
- Maxwell Institute, "Royal Skousen, "The Original and Printer's Manuscripts" (Book of Mormon lecture, 1 of 3)", YouTube
- At about 24:18 Royal Skousen talks a bit about the document popularly referred to as the Anthon Transcript.
- Maxwell Institute, "Royal Skousen, "The Nature of the Original Text" (Book of Mormon lecture, 3 of 3)", YouTube
- At about 2:10:13, an audience member question about the Book of Mormon translation process leads to Royal Skousen noting that the fragment popularly referred to as the Anthon Transcript is probably not the actual Anthon Transcript.
- "Anthon Transcript", The Cipher Foundation
- The section on Provenance gives good evidence that the supposed Anthon Transcript is not what David Whitmer claimed it to be.